In this page, you can see the academic works by Nursena Cetingul.
Welcome to a deep dive into the legal status and criminal liability of Artificial Intelligence. Guided by the comprehensive academic research of Nursena Çatıngül—a PhD candidate in public law, posthumanism & neurolaw researcher, and editor for the Istanbul Bar Association’s AI working group—we separate popular sci-fi AI myths from concrete legal realities.
Do machines actually “think,” or are we blinded by the Turing illusion? We explore John Searle’s famous Chinese Room experiment to understand why AI merely processes syntax without true semantic comprehension. Furthermore, we examine proposed legal frameworks like treating AI as property, establishing it as a legal entity, or the EU Parliament’s “electronic personality” proposal.
Ultimately, modern criminal law requires human free will, intent, and a guilty mind—things an algorithm simply does not possess. When AI causes harm, the liability must trace back to humans: the manufacturers, programmers, or users.
Read the full academic paper here (in Turkish): https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/iticusbe/article/979344
#AILaw#ArtificialIntelligence#CriminalLiability#Neurolaw#TechEthics#ElectronicPersonality#JohnSearle#ChineseRoomExperiment#MachineLearningLaw#TechPolicy#turingtest#aiandlaw#aithinking#sciencefiction